Hello all,
I have searched around a few forums and have noticed that in general, millennium edition ZR 600's sell for a few hundred $$ more than a standard 2000 ZR. However, when the new owners post about their recent purchase, they are almost always met with comments suggesting they overpaid.
The reason being, I currently own ZR 600 2k #275 and have a friend who is bugging me to sell it. I bought it new in 1999 and it only has 466 miles on it. It is all stock (track was never even studded) except for twin pipes, v force reeds, and rox sled treads.
I would like to be fair to both of us, so is it proper to go by book value for a 1999 ZR, a 2000 ZR, or add some sort of premium?
Thank you
I have searched around a few forums and have noticed that in general, millennium edition ZR 600's sell for a few hundred $$ more than a standard 2000 ZR. However, when the new owners post about their recent purchase, they are almost always met with comments suggesting they overpaid.
The reason being, I currently own ZR 600 2k #275 and have a friend who is bugging me to sell it. I bought it new in 1999 and it only has 466 miles on it. It is all stock (track was never even studded) except for twin pipes, v force reeds, and rox sled treads.
I would like to be fair to both of us, so is it proper to go by book value for a 1999 ZR, a 2000 ZR, or add some sort of premium?
Thank you