|
| PROCLIMB M 2012 + chassis |
 |
|
03-10-2011, 07:45 AM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Catskill Mts.
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Sled: 01 ZL 1010
06-07 Mileage: 500
|
 Quote: Originally Posted by predator800
Any know what the 800 weight is? 
I'd like to know that myself, if they can't match Doo's weights I might have to jump ship, weight is king>
|
|
|
03-10-2011, 11:46 AM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Sled: Turbo 2004 F7 D&D 800 EFI SnoPro 153"
10-11 Mileage: 500
09-10 Mileage: 300
ATV: 2005 Arctic Cat 500
|
2012 M1100 Turbo SoPro LTD = 562 pounds
|
|
|
03-10-2011, 05:55 PM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saskatoon, sk
Thanks: 44
Thanked 32 Times in 30 Posts
|
 Quote: Originally Posted by mtnxtreme
I'd like to know that myself, if they can't match Doo's weights I might have to jump ship, weight is king> 
It's been my expierence that just because the weight is less doesn't mean they perform better. A well ballanced machine is much better. All magazine writers agree M is better than doo in the mountains.
__________________
Snowchecked 2014 Grn SnoPro M8000
2011 M8 SnoPro (Fox Evol R's up front // BDX eye pod // BDX headlight delete )
2010 Predator 800 (started life as std CF // Fox Evol R's up front // BDX 40" light weight nickel plated chromoly A-Arms // BDX light weight nickel plated chromoly skid arms // Fox foat rear skid // Nextech Fox Float Air Reservoir // BDX inner wheel kit // BDX two wheel kit // BDX eye pod // BDX headlight delete kit // BDX Diamond Drive Lite 57/63 gears // BDX lite track shaft // BDX Ceramic Brake // BDX lite weight recoil // BDX Rock Rollers // BDX black box air intake // 2.25 Power Claw track // HPS ceramic coated light weight muffler // Speedwerx clutch kit // D and D shift assist bearing // Arctic FX custom wrap // BOSS seat // SLP Powder Pros) (estatimated diet lost 64lbs)
|
|
|
03-10-2011, 10:16 PM
|
#14
|
|
Junior Member
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sled: 2004 Kingkat
ATV: None
|
If we calculate the power to weight ratio, which I have done with conservative numbers, there is very little advantage (In theory) to the new sleds. I compared a 2010 M1000 HP/Weight versus the 2012 M1100 turbo HP(With D&D power module 215 HP on pump gas)Wieght.
With that said, only time will tell the "ground truth" in how they perform in real world conditions.
My gut feeling is a 215 HP sled would be a blast....but at 565 pounds, is the M1000 or even the M8 HO be funner?
What do you cats think?
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 12:09 AM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minnesota
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Sled: 12 proclimb 1100T 153, 04 mtncat 900 162
|
when your figuring power to weight ratios, keep in mind that the 1100t does not loose horsepower as you go up in elevation where as a non turbo engine loses 3% per 1000ft elevation! simple terms here if you got a sled that has 150 horse at sea level, that same sled is only going to have 100 horse at 10,000ft
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 07:03 AM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Catskill Mts.
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Sled: 01 ZL 1010
06-07 Mileage: 500
|
 Quote: Originally Posted by predator800
It's been my expierence that just because the weight is less doesn't mean they perform better. A well ballanced machine is much better. All magazine writers agree M is better than doo in the mountains. 
I hear that, but throwing around an extra 75 pounds, which is what the difference has been since 08, maybe even earlier, gets to be pretty played after a long day, and I don't speak for myself, I know a few guys that are eyeing up the XP and they been Cat guys for years. I had an 08 Summit XP and it was light, but I gotta agree with you in one aspect it had a kinda heavy feel in the front, never did quite figure that out, but it was 75 lbs. lighter than a 08 M8.
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 12:26 PM
|
#17
|
|
Member
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ramsey mn
Thanks: 7
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sled: 05 m7
|
I would think that the front would be pretty heavy on the 1100 and make that sled really want to dive in the powder.
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 02:05 PM
|
#18
|
|
Member
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cranbrook, BC
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Sled: 2012 Arctic Cat M8 Sno Pro 162
ATV: 2009 Arctic Cat Thundercat 1000
2009 Mileage: 500
2007 Mileage: 1500
|
 Quote: Originally Posted by stevewm7
I would think that the front would be pretty heavy on the 1100 and make that sled really want to dive in the powder. 
Well, if you read about the new M1100 more, Cat claims that they have almost equalized the weight 50/50. Which no other 4stroke has been able to do. So maybe it wont dive as bad as you think....
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 02:23 PM
|
#19
|
|
Junior Member
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sled: 2004 Kingkat
ATV: None
|
Teamboracer:
You are correct sir, this is a calc for sea-level conditions. Luckily our mountain riding in Alaska is significantly lower than mountain riders in the lower 48. Very rarely do I ride above 2000'... However, 75#'s is still 75#'s extra to be lugging around. Even "if" the sled is absolutley balanced, which I doubt for a first year model, it will still take more effort (work) on the rider and this has an exponential effect after 4 hours of riding in 6 foot of fresh snow. IMHO, unfortunately this is a step in the wrong direction; only time will tell.
As far as why the doo's nose dive, I believe the "rider-too-far-foward-position" is the diminishing return. Look at the doo's from the side and see where you actually stand in relation to the track and rear suspension. Just an observation..
Personnaly, I would love to have seen the 174" x 2.25" track on a sled...many times this year it would have been nice; but the 162 power claw did just fine and the 153 HCR's were envious...LOL.
This is a great forum you guys, I like seeing the posts of some real world riders without the drama...I think I found a new home..LOL
Last edited by alaskaKingKat; 03-11-2011 at 02:34 PM.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to alaskaKingKat For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-11-2011, 08:21 PM
|
#20
|
|
Junior Member
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Montana
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
|
I am trying to figure out where to shed weight on the m1100t
Confident I can follow a similar path as I did on my nytro....
Lightweight battery 10lbs
Exhaust can- 10-15 lbs.
Rear skid- Timbersled- 10 lbs.
Airbox area- 10-12 lbs???
Other thoughts?
|
|
|
Lower Navigation
|
|
|
| Search tags for this page |
|
2012 arctic cat m1100 turbo, 2012 m1100 dry weight, 2012 m1100 turbo, 2012 m1100 turbo extra idler wheels, arctic cat 1100 turbo weight, arctic cat m1100 turbo weight, arctic cat m1100 weight, how much does a polairs m1100 whiegh, hp on arctic cat m1100 turbo, m 1100 turbo hp forum, m1100 turbo, m1100 turbo weight, m1100arctic, weight 1100 turbo, weight of 2012 arctic cat 1100 turbo
Click on a term to search our sites for related topics.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|